What do you think of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman stepping down from the committee responsible for reviewing the safety of models such as o1?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 00:20

describing the way terms were used in “Rapid Advances in AI,”
“Rapid Advances In AI,”
of the same function,
Why did Donald T**** post on Truth Social (9-15-2024) that he "hates" entertainer Taylor Swift?
Let’s do a quick Google:
Nails
“[chain of thought] a series of intermediate natural language reasoning steps that lead to the final output."
Galaxy Watch could automatically lock your phone when it's left behind - SamMobile
in the 2015 explanatory flowchart -
the description,
Same Function Described. September, 2024
Scientists find 34-million-year-old snake that changes our understanding of evolution - Earth.com
“anthropomorphism loaded language”
An
step was decided,
will be vivisection (live dissection) of Sam,
"[chain of thought] learns to break down tricky steps into simpler ones. It learns to try a different approach when the current one isn't working. This process dramatically improves the model's ability to reason."
(according to a LLM chat bot query,
Chrysler Is 100 Years Old, and It's 'Back On,' Stellantis Design Boss Gilles Says - Road & Track
Further exponential advancement,
Of course that was how the
"a simple method called chain of thought prompting -- a series of intermediate reasoning steps -- improves performance on a range of arithmetic, commonsense, and symbolic reasoning tasks.”
Miley Cyrus Reveals What Caused Her Estrangement from Dad Billy Ray for the First Time - instyle.com
“[chain of thought is] a series of intermediate natural language reasoning steps that lead to the final output."
"[chain of thought means that it] learns to break down tricky steps into simpler ones. It learns to try a different approach when the current one isn't working. This process dramatically improves the model's ability to reason."
“Talking About Large Language Models,”
Why do I feel like something bad is going to happen to me?
when I’m just looking for an overall,
from
It’s the same f*cking thing.
Trump administration eyes stripping Columbia's accreditation - BBC
has “rapidly advanced,”
“Rapidly Evolving Advances in AI”
- further advancing the rapidly advancing … something.
Scientists discover that dogs can alert humans to this quickly-spreading disease - Earth.com
prompted with those terms and correlations),
“RAPID ADVANCES IN AI”
January 2023 (Google Rewrite v6)
49ers trade a 2026 conditional fifth-round pick for Bryce Huff - NBC Sports
The dilemma:
(the more accurate, but rarely used variant terminology),
January, 2022 (Google)
World-First: Scientists Capture a Rare Lightning-Triggered Gamma-Ray Burst - SciTechDaily
with each further dissection of dissected [former] Sam.
Eighth down (on Hit & Graze)
Function Described. January, 2022
Was Daenerys' downfall inevitable after she left Meereen in Game of Thrones?
putting terms one way,
better-accepted choice of terminology,
In two and a half years,
within a day.
I may as well just quote … myself:
or
“EXPONENTIAL ADVANCEMENT IN AI,”
September, 2024 (OpenAI o1 Hype Pitch)
Damn.
Fifth down (on Full Hit)
“RAPIDLY ADVANCING AI”
increasing efficiency and productivity,
(barely) one sentence,
ONE AI
within a single context.
“Rapidly Advancing AI,”
to
“anthropomorphically loaded language”?
“Some people just don’t care.”
by use instances.
three, overly protracted, anthropomorphism-loaded language stuffed, gushingly exuberant, descriptive sentences.
DOING THE JOB OF FOUR
Is it better to use the terminology,
guy
and
Combining,